Tag Archives: copywriting

Freelance journalism vs freelance copywriting: which is best? (The case for journalism.)

Back when I was 12 or 13 I decided to become a journalist. That was the life for me, I thought. Travel. Glamour. Smoking at my desk. Smoking in my car. Smoking in someone else’s car. Smoking on the phone. Smoking on someone else’s phone. Deadlines.

See, I loved Fletch. And I quite liked putting words together, telling funny stories. And I didn’t know what else to do.

So that was that. I was, I announced to the world, to become a journalist.

Then I did nothing about it for the next twenty years. Then I became a freelance journalist for a bit. Then I stopped. What a ride. What thrills. What storytelling abilities I still have. Go me.

Lately I’ve been thinking about going back into journalism. I’ve been just, you know, taking a look at the landscape. Giving it a poke and seeing if it moves.

See, I mostly do copywriting now. And I mostly like doing copywriting now. But there’s something about journalism that keeps drawing my attention. I can’t help myself. I keep giving it looks. Sexy looks using my eyes. Come hither looks. Looks you wouldn’t want to see. Why wouldn’t you want to see them? Oh, I don’t know, probably because they would stir the hell out of you. They certainly stir the hell out of me. I should know, I’ve been practicing them in the mirror.

In fact, I’m off to practice some of those looks in the mirror now.

Right, okay. Done. Anyway, there’s a lot about it I miss. Journalism, I mean – not the mirror. In fact, I DO MISS THE MIRROR, I’m going to go back there in a second. In the meantime, here are a few reasons why I think freelance journalism knocks freelance copywriting into a cocked hat.

1. You get bylines.

Who doesn’t love a byline? Nobody, that’s who. Quite illustrious, isn’t it, having your name and your photo in a paper like … The Guardian. Or The Independent. Or having a zinger-filled bio in the Contributors section of a travel magazine that reads like you dusted it off in five minutes over lunch but actually took hours. I don’t know. I just used to get a kick out of seeing my work in newspapers and magazines in newsagents. Once I was on the 73 bus and someone was reading a piece in a paper about how I nearly died of anaphylactic shock and I wanted to gently slide into the seat next to them and whisper, “I wrote this. Would you like me to read it to you? Ooh, look at this bit where my tongue swelled up so much that I could hardly talk.”

And copywriting? Not so much. It’s slim pickings, byline-wise. I write corporate scripts that get popped into other people’s mouths. I write blogs and newsletters and case studies and social posts and training modules and all kinds of other things that might have traces of me – or might have a lot of my personality pumped into them, poor things – but they aren’t really me as there’s not a photo and my name and a hilarious-yet-time-consuming bio.

Incidentally, the last thing that I wrote that could, at a stretch, be considered journalism, was actually anonymous. Far out, right? It was about playing poker for a living. One of the top rated comments on the piece (out of 240 or so) was:

“There’s so much going on here that’s psychologically bad, it’s hard to know where to start.”

Right then. Onwards.

Psychological badness, earlier.

2. You get to write as yourself.

Look, this isn’t the same as what I was saying above. What I’m saying here is this: as a journalist I wrote, wherever possible, about me. Writing about me was easy. Other people couldn’t do it, not really. And it meant I could get into all kinds of capers. Trying to sell my organs. Playing cards for 30 hours straight. Going for a football trial with Colchester United. Other things.

The good thing about writing about yourself, and about things that have happened to you, in your own voice, is that your work sails through the editing process.

“Well … okay,” harrumph the sub editors. “We suppose that’ll do.” And off it goes, to publishing heaven.

The editing or amends process in copywriting works a bit differently. What happens is that sometimes your work does just sail through. Actually, mostly. Maybe you have to change a word. Maybe you have to clarify something, or approve a change that someone has made but it’s, you know, more or less there and more or less painless.

But that doesn’t always happen.

Other times what happens is that you get five or six people in a document all taking potshots at your finely polished and laboured-over work and so, by extension, you feel like they’re taking potshots at your finely polished and laboured-over self. Which is quite something. Honestly, there have been times where I’ve gone into a document, seen the comments, glanced at the suggested edits, and felt my stress levels rise to that of a Yorkshire detective hunting a serial killer. Sweaty palms. Racing heart. Non-sexy eyes. All over a few comments. Ridiculous.

Anyway, we’re almost there now. Just one more reason to go.

Revising and Editing | Collins Education Associates

Editing, earlier.

3. You get to join a union.

I love unions. I loved being in the union when I was a postal worker. Out of the other hundred or so jobs I’ve had, I’ve never been in a union. But I love them. And as a journalist you can join the NUJ, the National Union of Journalists. I never did that, by the way, but if I go back to freelancing a bit, and I qualify, then I’m going to totally join the NUJ. Because I love unions.

…………………………………….

And that’s that. We’re done. Look, I’ll be honest: this didn’t turn out how I wanted it to. It probably didn’t turn out how you wanted it to either. Let’s call it a draw.

If I’m being entirely transparent, I lost heart a bit towards the end. I genuinely do want to write for magazines again at some point. And I also want to wrestle with a few hefty features for the FT Weekend, one of my favourite things to buy and read on the planet. But I also glimpsed at the rates freelance journalists are getting and the stories coming out of freelance journalist’s mouths and it made me shriek. Shriek, then scarper back to the sanctuary of freelance copywriting.

Which is up next time. There, we’ll take a closer look at the case for copywriting and I’ll do my best not to waffle on about being all sexy-eyed and that.

Until then.

Pitching The Guardian

Turns out I’m a big, fat liar.

Last time out, when I was writing about pitching The Drum, I said something like, “This is the first pitch I’ve sent in years.”

But then I remembered it wasn’t. See, a biggish thing happened to me last year. And I wanted to write about that biggish thing on here.

Thing is, when you’re writing about biggish things it’s easy to become foggy and mawkish. Plus: it’s still a bit raw.

A pitch on the other hand … I have no problem with posting a pitch about biggish things that have happened to me.

So here you go.

…………………

To: Andrew Gregory @TheGuardian; Barbara Speed @The Guardian

From: Pitching the World

Date: Apr 29, 2024

Subject: Post mini-stroke support is lacking – and alarming

Hi Barbara and Andrew,

First, huge apologies for the double-pitch. I didn’t know where this might be best suited – Opinion or Health. (It’s no excuse, really, but I’ve been out of the freelance journalism game for a while.)

Second, I feel like I have a decent feature brewing. 

Rageh Omaar had a suspected (by some) mini-stroke at the end of last week while hosting News at Ten and carried on. The week before that, I had a mini-stroke while playing tennis and also carried on. For about five games. Then I had to stop and go to the hospital in an ambulance with blue, flashing lights.

The incident was scary. I couldn’t speak properly. Plus: numb tongue, numb right side of my face, a numb right arm and numb right leg that wouldn’t really function. In hospital they tell you that you’ve had a mini-stroke – that bit is scary, too – and put you through all sorts of machines and do all manner of tests before popping you on statins, BP-lowering medication and anti-platelet medication before sending you home. 

But if the mini-stroke is scary, the landscape you face when you come out is scarier. I’m a reasonably fit, reasonably active, reasonably happy and reasonably middle-aged (48) writer. Yet I came out of the hospital worried. Worried that pushing too hard at work caused the stroke and that I might need to work at half the pace or – worse – give up work altogether. Worried that I’d have to move out of my flat. Worried that my life would unravel (again). 

Most of all, I was (and am) worried that I might have another stroke. I’ve seen some stats suggesting that almost one in three TIA survivors will go on to have a major stroke within a year. Some studies say that 11% of those who experience a TIA will have a bigger stroke within a week

The figures are hazy – and change from paper to paper and study to study. Yet the underlying reality is that TIAs are a warning and often signal a bigger stroke is on the way. So why is the after care so poor? Why are you sent from hospital with a follow-up appointment in six weeks’, a bag of drugs, and not much else? Why, with stroke being such a major cause of death and disability in the UK, are we not doing more to support those who have experienced a TIA – particularly in the first week or two?

And it doesn’t have to be massive help. Maybe some information on getting back to work, what you should and shouldn’t be eating, how often to exercise, how to deal with these blobs of depression and suicidal ideation. A number to call. A GP to chat with. That kind of thing. 

I’m really blathering, aren’t I? Sorry about that – it’s been a tricky couple of weeks. Anyway, anything in this, do you think?

Thanks for reading, cheerio for now,

Pitching the World

…………………

Updates on what happened with that pitch – and what happened to me after April – when I have the stomach for it.

April, earlier

What’s this? An actual pitch? To the actual Drum?

Turns out that being a best-selling author isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. After becoming a best-selling author, things went a bit wrong. Well, actually, things went a lot wrong. Life, eh? Look at it: going a lot wrong and that.

Anyway, that’s perhaps for another time. (You know, what’s been going on for the last seven years and how things went a bit – A LOT – wrong.) 

In the meantime, I actually wrote an actual pitch. My first one in years.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

To: Gordon Young @ The Drum

From: Pitching the World

Subject: I’m elevating this robust pitch, Gordon, with impactful writing solutions

Hi Gordon,

Sorry to email you out of the blue like this but I think I have something that might fit for The Drum. 

What if marketing-speak isn’t as bad as we think it all is?

So, in the advertising and marketing world we all can’t bear marketing speak, right? We’re sick of it. I know, as a jobbing copywriter, that I am. But as one of only a handful of copywriters in the UK who run their own experiments into the effectiveness of language* I didn’t want to just say it. I wanted to prove it. 

The idea? Take two pieces of text, both saying the same thing, but have one crammed with marketing-speak (‘unleash’, ‘innovative solutions’, ‘robust’ … you get the picture, I’m sure) and the other in well written plain-speak. My hypotheses? Plain-speak would trounce the marketing-speak. I ran them both through readability calculators and tested them out on an LLM (‘Is this writing clear?’ ‘Is this writing memorable?’ ‘Is this writing likely to be acted upon?’) and the plain-speak version shone brightly. Readability calculators loved it. LLMs loved it. And both hated the marketing-speak version. So far, so predictable.

Next, I tested out on the public – specifically through Prolific. I thought I’d have my suspicions confirmed – that there would be howls of protest, that participants in the study would loathe the marketing-speak version, that the overexposure and overuse of these words would have caused some sort of semantic bleaching and readers would find marketing-speak lazy, cliched, tired, foggily obscuring the message and a whole heap of other bad things.

But that didn’t happen. In fact, people preferred marketing-speak over plain-speak. So I ran my smallish pilot again. Same results. I cartoonified the language further, stretching it to ridiculous proportions – “Unleash more sales solutions” – and still the same thing. Overwhelmingly there was a feeling that marketing-speak sounded more ‘dynamic’ and ‘smarter’ and ‘more sophisticated and professional.’ 

Anything in this, Gordon? As copywriters, marketers and ad people we assume that the public are as tired as we are of the seemingly trite sentiments of marketing speak. But what if the truth is different from that? What if we – collectively – have to get out of our bubbles a bit more? (I’m saying this as someone who loves Japanese selvedge denim and Picasso t-shirts as much as the next person.) To actually, you know, go out and test out some of this stuff rather than making assumptions. There’s maybe even room to explore if a conversational tone of voice is all it’s cracked up to be. I’ve read studies and papers showing that, actually, there are some circumstances where a corporate TOV fits much better …

This is my first pitch in years. I know, I know: IT’S WAY TOO LONG. Sorry about that. If it’s not a good fit I have other places in mind but The Drum felt like a good home for it. I’ve got plenty of clipping from my time writing features for broadsheets and magazines and hundreds of columns and reviews if you’d like to see any published work. 

Many thanks indeed,

PTW

*You know what, I don’t know if this is true – but I do know that it feels true.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

A drum, earlier

Gordon, who’s the editor of The Drum, got back to me within an hour or two. “Wow,” he opened, “sounds sensational.” And went on to tell me that he passed my pitch on to John, The Drum’s Opinion editor. 

So, that’s a thing that happened. I sent a pitch and got a reply to a pitch. Who knows where that might go. 

And who knows where I might go. Nowhere, hopefully. I’ve missed this place like the dickens. But I also know that I have certain … proclivities. 

Thanks for reading.